Skip to main content
Most marketing reporting mixes two kinds of number together, and the mixture produces the worst of both. Put a closed-won figure next to a social engagement rate on the same page and one of two things happens. Either the slow number dominates and everyone loses patience with work that was always going to take three quarters to show up, or the fast number dominates and everyone over-reacts to noise, chasing a bad week and abandoning something that was working.

​
Leading indicators

These predict downstream movement. They are shown forward-looking, and the framing is explicit: here is what suggests something about next quarter. Search impressions trending. Reach to people who do not already follow you. Engagement relative to audience size rather than in absolute terms. Time spent on your editorial pages. The share of visitors who return. Newsletter open trend. How far into an episode people actually get. None of these are revenue. All of them move first, and a partnership where the leading indicators are climbing in month three is a partnership that is working even though nothing has closed yet.

​
Mid-funnel indicators

The transition events themselves. Newsletter clicks, downloads, calls booked, pipeline created. These sit alongside both views because they are the hinge between the two.

​
Lagging indicators

These confirm work already done. They are shown retrospectively with the lag stated on the page—work published in the first quarter has now produced this. Closed deals. Signed contracts and commitments. Retention. Customer lifetime value. The number of people searching for your company by name.

​
Why the layout matters

This is the patience problem solved as a design decision rather than a conversation you have to keep having. When leading indicators sit prominently and lagging ones sit in a clearly labeled retrospective panel, a client in month four can see genuine movement without anyone having to argue that the slow numbers will eventually arrive. And when the slow numbers do arrive, they are attributed to the period that actually produced them rather than to whatever happened to be running that month.

​
The lag is real

Work published in month one does not produce pipeline in month two. Depending on your sales cycle, the lag between the two is commonly three to nine months, and search is often slower still. We say this at kickoff, we put it on the dashboard, and we repeat it in the audit. Not to lower expectations, but because a partnership where both sides understand the lag makes better decisions than one where somebody is waiting for month three to justify itself.